Warhammer has always been political.
For the last few years the topic of female space marines has been a relatively hot topic in the 40k fandom. In this blog post I'd like to share two perspectives as a relatively casual 40k fan (casual insofar as I am not versed in recent lore). First I'd like to discuss the dated commentary and then how female space marines could contribute to the commentary of the setting and offer a new faction that is distinct from the Adeptus Astartes and Adeptus Sororitas.
Let's get into 40k lore (as I understand it, feel free to comment below). When Rogue Trader came out the world (specifically the UK) was a very different place. The UK economy was in dire straights. Unemployment was high.
![]() |
Notice the low and looooong dip starting in 1980 |
The number of people living in poverty in the UK rose dramatically during this period. Income inequality soared. And long with this came the growth in punk subcultures.
![]() |
Hive Ganger with a Crass tattoo |
![]() |
Crass, an anarchist punk band from the late 70s to mid 80s |
Thatcherite governance was also punctuated with centralizing power, conservative moral panic, police repression, fear of communist outsiders and persistent military spending (nearly double per capita what the UK spends today.) These themes are all reflected by the Imperium with it's highly centralized imperial government (though decentralized in other ways as there is semi-feudal governance over distant worlds that owe fealty to the emperor) constant alertness to the threat of heresy, liberalism, rebellion, and mutation, the inquisition, rampant xenophobia, and galaxy-spanning military industrial complex that is perpetually at war.
We can also acknowledge some aspects of 1980s politics that are absent from Rogue Trader. For example we might acknowledge the AIDS epidemic in the gay community and women's liberation.
A lot has changed since the late 80s and a lot has stayed the same or become salient again. Many of the roots of the current political crisis are found in the 1980s. But some issues have taken on new preeminence and new dimensions. In short, I think that we can agree that a lot has happened and changed in nearly 40 years. Warhammer's politics are in need of an update to stay current with the times while adhering to it's anarchist roots.
Let's talk about the Custodes
Most radical feminists and feminist scholars want equality for men, women, and non-binary individuals, they also want to abolish the draft. So, for them making women also subject to the draft is not a victory, rather abolition of the draft for both men and women is the goal. Relatedly, liberal white feminists are concerned with breaking the glass ceiling and seeing white women in boardrooms. In contrast, radical feminists are concerned with who the shards of glass fall upon - namely poor/bipoc women here at home and in the colonial periphery. They don't view women also wielding the violent tools of patriarchy upon marginalized people as a victory. Rather the tools of patriarchy itself have to be dismantled.
All of that is to say that the type of representation of women in Warhammer matters. It's not enough to simply have women in Warhammer; how they are represented matters especially if it is to honor the radical roots of Warhammer's Rogue Trader legacy. Placing women into the top echelons of imperial power gives Girl Boss vibes and serves to undermine the satire and commentary of the Imperium being an oppressive authoritarian and failed state. It is not clear how the addition of female custodes adds to the satire and commentary of the 40k universe. It'd be like if Warlord games added female models to their line of German bolt action miniatures: it's not the diversity we need. I want to be clear that I am arguing in favor of more diversity and inclusivity in Warhammer, just doing it in a way that adds depth to the world and improves the story telling.
Enter Female Space Marines
The first and central premise that needs to be established when talking about female space marines is that the Imperium lies and cannot be trusted as a narrator. The Imperium are not good guys. They are an oppressive, predatory, failed state. So all of the lore about women not being fit for gene seed implantation needs to be thrown out as lies and propaganda.
What was the imperium hiding with that lie? Women space marines can reproduce and thereby reproduce the gene seed itself. This has huge implications. It means that a legion of female space marines is not limited in number like traditional space marine legions. This means that female space marines are fundamentally less controllable than male space marine legions. Remember, the Imperium has a pathological need for control, so female space marines that can reproduce the gene seed is something they cannot abide. Imagine the Jem'Hadar from DS9 who were not reliant on Ketracel-white. Effectively the Imperium manufactured a problem for themselves (again.)
It also means that if female space marines are broken off from the supply lines of the Imperium but continue to reproduce they will not all be clad in power armor and armed with bolters. Right away from a design/game/aesthetic perspective they start to pull away from the traditional space marine look.
Next, we know that there are 2 redacted space marine legions. What if these two legions are women? But then we have to ask, why are they redacted? And we would have to have a really good reason to have them redacted. 1. Because it has to make sense in the universe and 2. You can only use this plot contrivance once or twice. You can't come along a few years later and say "hey, BTW there's actually a 3rd redacted legion."
So why are they redacted?
Imagine a deamonically possessed space marine general of immense power. No matter how individually powerful this one dude is, he is no match for the laser batteries of an imperial battleship in orbit. I know the chaos folks have their own ships and legions and whatnot. But the point is that the lore often focuses on individuals that pose a threat to the imperium rather than movements (Tau and Tyranids aside). I understand that is a useful plot contrivance for compelling storytelling but it falls apart in terms of galactic threats. What could threaten the Imperium is an ideology that can't even be officially recognized.
It may be more plausible that instead these other threats are used as propaganda/justification to keep the Imperium in a constant state of fanatical militarism and paranoia in order to fight the existential threat of anti-authoritarian rebellion: to stamp out the real beating heart of humanity itself - our innate desire for freedom.
But is that grimdark?
What might their faction look/play like?
It might be an interesting opportunity to introduce a faction that fights in very different ways with very different aims.
What do you think should GW introduce female space marines? Are there better ways to align this with the lore? Would this get past the "but will it sell??" argument?
No comments:
Post a Comment